At a glance

What this dataset shows

  • 1,342 county rows were matched to the 2025 QCEW snapshot.
  • Employment is annual-average covered employment; establishments are reporting locations; wages are nominal average weekly wages.
  • Suppressed or unavailable values remain missing instead of being treated as zero.

01 / Visual summary

County areas with the highest reported employment

Top county rows by annual-average employment in NAICS 562910; use the download for the checked selection.

Jobs by year. Benton County, WA: 3,776; Los Angeles County, CA: 2,963; Alameda County, CA: 1,882; Harris County, TX: 1,852; Orange County, CA: 1,761; Queens County, NY: 1,085; Tarrant County, TX: 978; San Diego County, CA: 920; Maricopa County, AZ: 875; Dallas County, TX: 831; Clark County, NV: 713; Marion County, IN: 706. Exact values in the adjacent data table.03k5k8k10kBenton County, WA: 3,776Los Angeles County, CA: 2,963Alameda County, CA: 1,882Harris County, TX: 1,852Orange County, CA: 1,761Queens County, NY: 1,085Tarrant County, TX: 978San Diego County, CA: 920Maricopa County, AZ: 875Dallas County, TX: 831Clark County, NV: 713Marion County, IN: 706Benton County, WALos Angeles County, CAAlameda County, CAHarris County, TXOrange County, CAQueens County, NYTarrant County, TXSan Diego County, CAMaricopa County, AZDallas County, TXClark County, NVMarion County, IN

02 / Exact values

Top county employment rows

Top county rows from the 2025 BLS QCEW NAICS 562910 snapshot.

Top county rows from the 2025 BLS QCEW NAICS 562910 snapshot.
CountyStateEmploymentEstablishmentsAverage weekly wage
Benton CountyWashington3,77619$2,570
Los Angeles CountyCalifornia2,963172$1,627
Alameda CountyCalifornia1,88246$1,961
Harris CountyTexas1,85296$1,944
Orange CountyCalifornia1,76190$1,821
Queens CountyNew York1,08541$1,858
Tarrant CountyTexas97842$1,728
San Diego CountyCalifornia92079$1,708
Maricopa CountyArizona875108$1,515
Dallas CountyTexas83157$1,472
Clark CountyNevada71376$1,208
Marion CountyIndiana70642$1,232
Middlesex CountyMassachusetts66450$1,768
Suffolk CountyNew York65957$1,834
Bexar CountyTexas65438$1,531
Hillsborough CountyFlorida65156$1,511
King CountyWashington64080$1,425
St. Louis CountyMissouri62337$1,634
Kings CountyNew York60344$1,473
Nassau CountyNew York59533$1,590
Howard CountyMaryland58814$1,269
Capitol Planning RegionConnecticut58252$1,491
Allegheny CountyPennsylvania54840$1,561
Cook CountyIllinois53458$1,752
Broward CountyFlorida53174$6,151
Sacramento CountyCalifornia51334$1,580
Norfolk CountyMassachusetts50431$1,885
East Baton Rouge ParishLouisiana49427$1,443
Duval CountyFlorida49341$1,583
Honolulu CountyHawaii49046$1,838
South Central Connecticut Planning RegionConnecticut48142$1,672
Snohomish CountyWashington47842$1,780
Adams CountyColorado47237$1,525
Ramsey CountyMinnesota47114$1,737
Arapahoe CountyColorado46648$1,681
Hampden CountyMassachusetts44625$1,624
Anchorage MunicipalityAlaska43032$1,965
San Bernardino CountyCalifornia41731$1,601
Erie CountyNew York40618$1,557
Ascension ParishLouisiana39412$1,438
Miami-Dade CountyFlorida39457$1,395
Lake CountyIndiana39020$1,551
Calcasieu ParishLouisiana38018$1,620
Guilford CountyNorth Carolina37719$2,183
Washington CountyOregon37418$1,492
Middlesex CountyNew Jersey36621$2,080
Fresno CountyCalifornia36314$1,817
Bernalillo CountyNew Mexico36131$1,110
Pierce CountyWashington36029$1,339
Cuyahoga CountyOhio35826$1,794

05 / Context

What county QCEW measures

The county table uses the 2025 annual QCEW snapshot for private NAICS 562910, the BLS classification for remediation services. It reports employer locations, annual-average employment and average weekly wage where BLS publishes a value; it is not a directory of every contractor or a measure of local demand.

County comparisons can be affected by disclosure rules and by the fact that one company may operate multiple establishments. Read an establishment as a reporting location in the QCEW frame, not as a unique legal business.

  • Employment is annual-average covered employment.
  • Establishments are annual-average reporting locations.
  • Weekly wages are nominal industry averages, not individual pay promises.

06 / Context

How to use the county ranking

The visible table is limited to the highest employment rows so the page remains readable; the download contains the full checked county selection. Counties with missing or suppressed fields remain missing rather than being treated as zero.

Use this dataset to compare the observable footprint of NAICS 562910. Pair it with the remediation services report for the national and state trend, and avoid presenting the ranking as a forecast of restoration work.

Conclusion

Use the table with its definition.

Use the county table to understand where BLS reports classified remediation-services employment. Pair it with the national and state report for trends, and keep the NAICS, year and disclosure rules attached to any reuse.

Sources and limits

Read the source notes before reusing the numbers.

This page preserves the dataset scope, period and limitations. The figures are not a forecast, an insurance estimate, a measure of individual risk, or a ranking beyond the selection described above.

BLS QCEW open data official website favicon

BLS QCEW open data

Annual-average employment, establishments and average weekly wages for NAICS 562910.

Open official source ↗

OpenAI assisted with explanatory prose. Tables and charts are rendered from checked local source snapshots.